Menu 

Fatal crash increases pressure for traffic light

A car exiting the gates of the Regency/Laurel Ridge/Crossings complex on Route 7 faces a gauntlet of traffic on Route 7. An accident there last Friday has intensified efforts to speed approval of a traffic light planned at the site for close to two years. —Macklin Reid

A car exiting the gates of the Regency/Laurel Ridge/Crossings complex on Route 7 faces a gauntlet of traffic on Route 7. An accident there last Friday has intensified efforts to speed approval of a traffic light planned at the site for close to two years. —Macklin Reid

A fatal accident has galvanized interest in putting a traffic light on Route 7 where a motorcyclist slammed into a car making a cross-traffic turn into a senior citizen complex last Friday afternoon.

“We will get this done,” First Selectman Rudy Marconi vowed to a meeting of about 40 townhouse owners from The Regency at Ridgefield on Tuesday morning.

That afternoon, Town Engineer Charles Fisher told a Board of Selectmen’s meeting he would advertise for bids on the project next week.

The traffic light has been in works for about two years — a share of $150,000 cost was approved by voters as a capital item in the May 2012 budget referendum, and there were expectations it would soon proceed.

Design work started that August and some progress has been made. But for months now town officials have been awaiting approval from the state Department of Transportation and utilities that have to sign off on the plans.

The signal would be just north of Route 7’s intersection with Route 35 — where there’s already a light. It would regulate traffic flow at the driveway serving  Regency at Ridgefield townhouses, Ridgefield Crossings assisted living, and Laurel Ridge Health Care Center.

The town has lined up a grant to cover half the estimated $150,000, with the remaining $75,000 to be shared between the town and private stakeholders at Regency, Laurel Ridge and Ridgefield Crossings.

Owners at the 73-unit Regency condominiums put the traffic light proposal on the town’s agenda two years ago. And in the months of waiting since, then they have lobbied town officials both one and one and in groups at public meetings.

Then, on Friday, a motorcyclist northbound on Route 7 hit a car that had been southbound, and was turning into the Regency complex driveway. The car’s driver was reportedly a woman going to visit her husband in the Laurel Ridge Health Care Center.

“The people here are really up in arms, and very very anxious,” said Stephen Mencher of Regency’s homeowners association.

“We’re not happy. We’ve already waited,” one Regency resident told Mr. Marconi and Town Engineer Charles Fisher on Tuesday.

“I feel like a prisoner here,” he said. “It’s gotten to the point the flow of traffic is just impossible.”

Before the Regency crowd Tuesday Mr. Marconi and Mr. Fisher reviewed all the steps the town had taken to prod the state Department of Transportation toward the approval needed to advance the project.

“I don’t blame you,” Mr. Fisher told the residents.

Last August, he said, the town had contracted with the design engineering firm, BL Companies, to handle the job.

There were field surveys, preliminary designs.

“It’s not just sticking a couple of poles in the ground and stringing a light,” he said. “There’s a lot of things to take into account — utilities, right-of-way locations.”

Everything had to be approved by the state Department of Transportation.

“Working with the DOT is a slow process,” he said.

When his consulting engineer turned in the preliminary designs, “the state took its time and responded with a laundry list of changes,” Mr. Fisher said.

The engineer sent DOT revisions based on the critique.

“Then they made more comments, and the second round of comments was bigger than the first round of comments,” Mr. Fisher said.

Department of Transportation spokesman Kevin Nursick told The Press Tuesday requests for “transportation infrastructure” such as traffic lights are reviewed by the state with consideration of the problems at the specific location, but also with an eye to maintaining a uniform traffic standards across the state.

The state’s roads must present a system rules and signs and signals that drivers will trust as sensible and necessary — or they won’t obey them.

“The general public thinks it’s a simple process to decide if, when and where you install these devices. It’s much more complicated,” he said. “You have various criteria you want to meet before you install these things…

“To keep the confidence of the motoring public, you only install devices where they’re  justified and warranted, as per accepted transportation principles and engineering principals.

“Believe me, you have people who are constantly asking for a traffic signal here or there, or a stop sign here or there,” he said.  “If you install these without meeting the warranting criteria, you lose the confidence and compliance of the motoring public.”

The Route 7 light approval has been progressing through the review system.

“I think they should be right on the border of being done with design and ready to move ahead with construction,” Mr. Nursick said.

Monday Mr. Fisher said his communications with the town’s engineering consultant on the project, Fred Greenberg of Meriden-based BL Companies, indicated that the needed state DOT approval awaited CL&P’s agreement.

He shared an e-mail exchange from that morning.

“I am growing concerned about the lack of progress on this project,” Mr. Fisher wrote.  “On Friday afternoon a fatality occurred at this intersection.  When can I expect to receive contract documents so that we can place this project out to bid?”

Mr. Greenberg replied: “I am still trying to finalize some utility clearance issues with CL&P.  They have been impossible to work with on this project. Once I have those resolved, I can get CTDOT to sign off.”

CL&P spokesman Mitch Gross said Tuesday that part of the “clearance” problem was that the electrical lines were hung from poles owned by AT&T, another company.

“These are AT&T’s poles, so AT&T is being brought into the discussion,” Mr. Gross said.

“We certainly understand the desire to move this along as quickly as possible, and are working with the town, and DOT and, of course, AT&T,” Mr. Gross said. “Moving our equipment will be coordinated with AT&T. We can’t move our stuff until they put new poles up, basically, or they relocate the poles.”

Tuesday, following the morning meeting with Regency residents and the noon selectmen’s meeting at which he announced he would advertising for bids next week, Mr. Fisher explained the change in approach.

“I called Fred Greenberg, the project manager for this project, immediately after the meeting to get a status report and talk about the meeting with the Regency residents,” Mr. Fisher said. “Mr. Greenberg felt that the project was far enough along now that we can advertise, any additional comments from the review agencies or utilities could be addressed in a bid addendum. I anticipate advertising the project next Friday.”

Mr. Fisher said the state required that adverting for bids go on 30 days. Once bids are in,  the successful low bidder must be vetted by the town, with state oversight, before a contract is awarded. That usually take about two weeks.

He wasn’t sure how long the construction would take once the bid is awarded.

“I would imagine it’ll be maybe 60 days, 90 days at the most,” Mr. Fisher said.

Mr. Marconi agreed to have regular meetings with Regency homeowners to keep them updated on the progress.

And he assured them that the fatal accident had made an impression on everyone.

“All of us in the town understand exactly how you feel,” Mr. Marconi said.

“I feel badly for the gentleman who was killed — 50 years old. I feel badly for the lady who made the turn.”


This week’s Ridgefield Press also contains several letters dealing with the traffic on this stretch of Route 7.

About author

By participating in the comments section of this site you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and User Agreement

  • rdg-oldtimer

    As an ALIVE MC rider, this area is one of the most dangerous in the area and this project can not be done soon enough.

  • Secondhand Rose

    IF cops would enforce the traffic and speeding laws, and

    IF drivers would use some common sense (such as, NOT making left turns across 4 lanes of traffic when exiting Laurel Ridge, and

    IF drivers would pay attention and not try to “jump out” in front of oncoming cars trying to beat them across the roadway, then

    there would be no need to waste taxpayer money on an issue where LACK OF common sense and police enforcement are the Number One reasons why accidents happen in the first place.

    But hey, we’re all made of money in this town; why not just go ahead and ask us to pay more, More, MORE for your stupid ideas!

  • cosmo p

    WOW when this facility fas first talked about for construction this situation was clearly brought up and now people do not like the outcome. We fought against it tooth and nail the fire department stated it would take 80% of the EMT calls along with ambulance calls. Traffic issues were brought up and now everyone is screaming for a traffic light. Well here is the issue as i see it. People do not stop for red lights stop signs or are gabbing on phones while driving. Try and get out of bennets farm road even with a light and oncoming traffic that does not stop for the red light on RT7 will mow you down. Next time maybe our fearless leaders that inhabit 400 main street will listen to people. Not a chance the voters of this town still send them back every time to destroy our once great town. Blame it on the VOTERS they put these people in power!!

    • rdg-oldtimer

      Blame it on the VOTERS they put these people in power!!——-Right on, Cosmo!

  • cosmo p

    Old timer that guy that died was a very good friend of my sons. He was a very nice guy. Witnesses said the driver did some crazy u turn or missed the driveway or just did something crazy. Even with a light the driver clearly did not see the BIKE.

  • Secondhand Rose

    The smartest move this town could make would be to completely eliminate cross-traffic turns on both Route 7 and Route 35.

    There is nothing that causes more accidents than clueless people attempting to jump out into traffic making cross-traffic turns because they got tired of waiting for traffic to lessen up to enable their exit.

    Are people in this town so lazy that they can’t be bothered to utilize Ligi’s Way? Why bother having business parking lot exits onto Ligi’s Way if town residents are too stupid or stubborn to use them? It’s so much FASTER using Ligi’s Way than trying to get out onto Route 35 one would think EVERYONE would be doing it.

    And on the opposite side of the street, every business from Broderick’s on down has pass-throughs in their parking lots all the way down through and out of Stop & Shop. For the life of me I can’t understand why people don’t avail themselves of these faster easier shortcuts.

  • spdmac

    P&Z very specifically stated during the Gateway retail discussion that “the road was not their problem” and that they needed to “let the state worry about the road.” I hope they have the courage to say that to this man’s family. This is exactly what is going to keep happening, regardless of whether or not a light is installed, with the further development and increased traffic on Route 7.

© Hersam Acorn. All rights reserved. The Ridgefield Press, 16 Bailey Avenue, Ridgefield, CT 06877

Designed by WPSHOWER

Powered by WordPress